, April 2002
|
This page examines the Fundamentalist Christian view that humans are essentially "bad". The original verision was posted posted on the GodAndScience Messageboard in April 2002. GodAndScience has a page "People are Basically Good" - Proof to the Contrary. This concludes: "Evolution does not account for the extremes of our violent behavior, but the Christian worldview fits the data exactly - humans are basically evil until transformed by the renewing power of Jesus Christ."How bizarre. Christians are never done complaining about one aspect of Darwin's theories - "the survival of the fittest". Evolution clearly does have an explanation for both morality and violent behaviour: it is part of the dynamic of the struggle between what's best for the individual and what's best for the group... On the contrary, the Christian worldview is thoroughly warped. Let's examine it in more detail. First, God creates man in his own image: "And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness..." (Gen 1:26) Later, Eve is tempted by "the serpent" - also created by God: "Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?... For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil" (Gen 3:1-5) God then really lets rip, punishing the serpent (Gen 3:14), womankind (Gen 3:16), and Adam and all of mankind (Gen 3:17-24). In human terms, God's behaviour here is completely immoral. He knew - or ought to have known - the events which would transpire. His reaction - punishing Adam and Eve and all of their descendents is grotesquely out of proportion. The only solace offered to man - in both the Old and New Testaments - is devotion to God. Without that, each individual is damned. If a human being treated a child that way, we would not be surprised to see the child growing up to be extremely damaged; and we could consider the parent to be morally reprehensible. Now, traditionally, Judaism and Christianity have explained this insane version of events in terms similar to those expressed by our esteemed host, Richard Deem, in his article "There is Too Much Evil and Suffering For God to Exist?": "God created humans in order to have a personal relationship with them, which He had with Adam and Eve before they sinned... A personal relationship, characterized by the possibility of love, is only possible if created beings are given free will. If God had created the universe with no possibility of evil or sin, then the created beings would have had no free will, and, as such, would essentially be programmed computers. Such beings would be incapable of love, since love involves making a choice - which requires the ability to choose not to love... God created the universe for the express purpose of allowing free will spiritual beings the opportunity to have fellowship with Him (and likewise, reject Him)."To understand this in more detail, I turned to the The Oxford Companion to the Bible's entry on "Evil" (p208) "In Israel's earliest traditions, the presence of evil in the world is taken for granted as a reality that is philosophically non problematic. There is no terminological distinction between moral evil and calamity, for the same Hebrew word... is used for both. Evil is anything that is unpleasant, repulsive or distorted (Gen 41:3-4)..."So there we have it. If we want to understand the Christian world view of the way things are, you can't look to the Bible... We have to look for external explanations. On 2 January 2002, Richard Deem of GodAndScience wrote on that site's weblog: "We are not punished for the sin of Adam And Eve. However, like all good parents, they pass on their propensity for sin to their children. In other words, your parents taught you how to sin, and you found that sin "worked" so you adopted it into your lifestyle and teach it to your children. Is it fair that your parents taught you how to sin? Maybe not, but it was a choice that they made..."But how can the mythical "the God of the Bible" escape guilt for allowing sin to exist in the first place? This is from the Catholic Encyclopedia entry for Original Sin: "Original sin may be taken to mean: (1) the sin that Adam committed; (2) a consequence of this first sin, the hereditary stain with which we are born on account of our origin or descent from Adam. From the earliest times the latter sense of the word was more common, as may be seen by St. Augustine's statement: "the deliberate sin of the First man is the cause of original sin".And this is from the Fundamentalist ChristianAnswer's WebBible on Sin: "Original sin. "Our first parents being the root of all mankind, the guilt of their sin was imputed, and the same death in sin and corrupted nature were conveyed to all their posterity, descending from them by ordinary generation." Adam was constituted by God the federal head and representative of all his posterity, as he was also their natural head, and therefore when he fell they fell with him (Rom. 5:12-21; 1 Cor. 15:22-45). His probation was their probation, and his fall their fall. Because of Adam's first sin all his posterity came into the world in a state of sin and condemnation, i.e., (1) a state of moral corruption, and (2) of guilt, as having judicially imputed to them the guilt of Adam's first sin."Here's more, from their page on What is the eternal destiny of an infant who dies?: "We cannot simply assume that children are "innocent" and are therefore exempt from the penalties of sin. The Bible teaches clearly that infants are in a state of sin and need to be regenerated. They, like all humanity, can be saved only through Christ..."The idea that parents can "teach" children not to sin is pretty horrific. (I'm reminded of the scene in Carrie where Piper Laurie beats Sissy Spacek for having her first period). Maybe that's why so much child abuse in America is justified in the name of Religion... So much for the compassionate, just, omnipotent and omniscient Christian God.
From an original posted on the GodAndScience Messageboard in April 2002. |
|
Please link to this page if you copy from or refer to it.
PTET homepage | top of page | e-mail PTET |
|